PROJECTS & AWARDS

Research Fellowships

Dr Laura Carey – Awarded July 2022. Current end date September 2026

Project: Vascular changes in acute kidney injury and sepsis using a novel technique for imaging red blood cells.

Background:

Sepsis is a life-threatening loss of organ function caused by a dysregulated host response to infection(1). Sepsis is the commonest cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically unwell patients, and is independently associated with higher odds of death and longer hospitalization(2–9). Albuminuria observed in sepsis-AKI suggests glomerular filtration barrier (GFB) dysfunction and may contribute to disease progression through renal epithelial injury(7,10). If so, the mechanisms that lead to albuminuria may be considered as therapeutic targets.

There is evidence that one potential mechanism is through loss of the glycocalyx(7,11,12). The glycocalyx is a gel like layer covering the luminal surface of the endothelium, acting as a filtration barrier at the fenestrated endothelium in the glomeruli(10). It is a dynamic structure, rapidly shed and synthesized facilitating endothelial adaptation to changes in local environment(13). Alterations to glomerular glycocalyx occurs in sepsis models in mice including lipopolysaccharide and TNF-alpha administration(7). In a rat sepsis-AKI model, increased urinary albumin is associated with GFB structural changes and decreased expression of key glycocalyx components(11). In humans, the depth of the sublingual glycocalyx is reduced in volunteers receiving low dose endotoxin and increased plasma levels of the glycocalyx constituent hyaluronan suggest glycocalyx shedding(12). Decreased glycocalyx thickness correlates with kidney dysfunction and hospital mortality in sepsis(14,15). Glycocalyx shedding is therefore likely to be a crucial step in the pathogenesis of sepsis-AKI.

Demonstrating glycocalyx loss in humans has been technically challenging. It is possible to detect glycocalyx proteoglycans in urine and plasma, suggestive of increased shedding, but the clinical value of these techniques is still unclear. Altered glomerular filtration and saturation of the intracellular pathways responsible for synthesis of glycocalyx proteoglycans during periods of increased shedding are two obvious confounders. Non-invasive imaging techniques, such as Glycocheck TM, indirectly measure glycocalyx dysfunction in the mucosal microcirculation of the mouth. This technique assumes glycocalyx shedding is a systemic phenomenon, but questions remain about its accuracy and reproducibility(16,17).

A novel technique measuring the depth of human red blood cell (RBC) glycocalyx has been developed in Bristol by Dr Butler and has the potential to unlock understanding of glycocalyx dysfunction in disease states. Preliminary data shows that RBC glycocalyx correlates with glomerular glycocalyx thickness and predicts glomerular albumin permeability. In humans, Glycocheck TM measurements correlate significantly with the RBC glycocalyx depth in pregnant women. Importantly the RBC assay is much easier to conduct, requiring only a blood sample, and has an improved intraclass correlation (0.66 vs 0.33 for GlycocheckTM). Moreover, there are distinct RBC glycocalyx appearances between albuminuric and non-albuminuric women. These findings suggest that RBC glycocalyx depth is a useful marker of systemic glycocalyx injury. Dr Butler has just been awarded a prestigious MRC Clinician Scientist fellowship to use the RBC assay in diabetes, demonstrating that the potential of the assay has been recognised following detailed scrutiny.

To test the hypothesise that albuminuria in sepsis-AKI results from loss of glycocalyx, we aim to measure RBC glycocalyx depth using a novel RBC assay and compare results from patients with sepsis-AKI to healthy controls.

Dr Kitty Hiu Fung Wong – Awarded April 2024. Current end date December 2026

Project: Feasibility of emulating successful randomised-controlled trials in surgery and perioperative care using routinely collected real-world data in the NHS

Background:

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are recognised as the ‘gold standard’ for evaluating the comparative effectiveness of clinical interventions. However, they are generally difficult to perform, time-consuming and expensive. Surgical RCTs appear even more difficult and only make up 15% of all clinical trials with just half of these being published, leading to significant research waste.(1) Higher quality surgical RCTs are needed(2), but challenges remain with designing more complex trials and addressing clinical questions in areas where an RCT may not be feasible, ethical, or timely.

Observational studies of routinely collected ‘real-world’ data may be an alternative to evaluate the risks and benefits of clinical interventions in surgery and peri-operative care, as they could address clinical research priorities without the limitations associated with RCTs. There is greater availability of routinely-collected data in the NHS with a large number of registries being funded by the the healthcare quality improvement partnership (HQIP). A previous Cochrane Review has shown comparable effect estimates between observational studies and RCTs(3), but concerns (including from the National Institute of Health Care and Excellence [NICE]) remain about the use of routinely-collected data for the evaluation of healthcare interventions due to a number of potential risks of bias.(4)

The target trial framework is a novel approach that can mitigate methodological concerns associated with the use of routinely-collected data. Applying the principles of RCTs and using causal inference methodology, a “target trial” can be emulated using routinely-collected data(5,6). This is comparatively more cost-effective and can minimize risk of bias in observational data, having been shown to replicate the results of published RCTs in cardiology and oncology(6–8). Target trials can also interrogate potentially interesting or under-represented subgroups that may not be feasible within RCTs; and in turn inform future RCT design. Recently, the “Emergency Surgery or Not” (ESORT) study conducted by members of our research team utilised target trial methodology to assess relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of emergency surgery in five acute conditions(9,10), demonstrating the feasibility of using target trials and routinely-collected data. However, several methodological challenges were identified such as defining the study population, intervention, time of ‘randomisation’, and adjusting for confounders.11 The effectiveness of target trials remains unclear, and it is uncertain what the limitations are to widespread adoption of target trials, and how routinely-collected data can be adapted for target trial design.

We aim to conduct a systematic review of National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) funded trials in surgery and perioperative care, to explore the feasibility of emulating a similar target trial using routinely-collected data and identify any barriers. This study is nested within a larger programme of work aimed at establishing the accuracy, feasibility, and developing the role of target trials in the NHS to compliment RCT design and reduce research waste. The results will also compliment ongoing target trial delivery work from our unit, including the NIHR-funded “Emergency Surgery Or noT for common Vascular conditions (ESORT-V) study.

Dr Lu Yang & Dr Claire Rice – Awarded April 2024. Current end date Marc h 2027

Project: The gut microbiome as a modifiable risk factor for MS in people with non-European ancestral background.

Background:

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune neuroinflammatory disease; the host immune system attacks myelin in the central nervous system (CNS) causing neurological symptoms and disability. An incomplete understanding of the aetiology and pathophysiology of MS has limited progress towards a cure. It is clear that MS is a highly complex, heterogenous disease which arises due to the interaction between multiple genetic and environmental factors.

The human gut microbiome is an exciting new territory in MS research. Approximately a quadrillion microbe – 10(15) – live in the human gut, making up >50% cells in the body. Many factors including ethnicity, race, genetics, home environment, diet, social interaction, education and socioeconomic status are known to influence gut microbiome which, in turn, regulates the homeostasis of the immune system(1) As both a ‘environmental sensor’ and ‘immune system regulator’, the gut microbiome is therefore a logical target to explore with reference to the missing link in the interplay between the environmental and genetic risk factors underlying MS.

Three key strands of evidence implicating the gut microbiome in neuroinflammation emerge from pre-clinical studies. First, gut microbiome composition directly impacts development of MS phenotype. Experimental allergic encephalitis (EAE) is the animal model of MS. EAE mice without gut microbiome do not develop MS symptoms, only doing so after gut microbe colonisation(2). Furthermore, EAE germ free mice develop severe disease upon receipt of a faecal transplant from people with MS but mild disease if the donor is a heathy monozygotic twin of the MS patient(3). Second, the gut microbiome is needed for development of functional microglia – resident immune cells within the CNS. Microglia in GF mice fail to mount immune responses during infection(4) and, in aged brains, gut microbiome dysbiosis cause microglia to shift from a neuroprotective to pro-inflammatory state(5) Third, the gut microbiome is required to maintain blood brain barrier (BBB) integrity; in its absence, the BBB leaks, allowing infiltration of immune cells from the blood(6) The first large-scale study profiling the gut microbiome in people with MS was published recently, and reported distinct differences in microbiome profile correlating with disease severity(7). Combining preclinical and clinical evidence, it is therefore evident that the gut microbiome could be a modifiable factor linking the environment with immune system dysfunction in MS.

People from non-European ancestral background (NEAB) are at higher risk of developing MS and have poorer prognosis(8). The highest risk is for those from Africa and Asia who adopt a ‘westernised’ lifestyle following migration to Europe/North America. Critically, NEAB individuals have been categorically under-represented in MS research; 80% participants in MS genetic studies were of European descent and the MS gut microbiome profiling study included only White participants(9). In addition to the obvious research inequality, this represents a knowledge gap for this expanding patient population. We will begin to address this in a feasibility study exploring changes in the gut microbiome in people with MS in a diverse UK population.

WGJ Hampson Memorial Fund Prize

Gulraj Mathuru, Orthopaedic Registrar

Project: Is the rate of revision of 36mm metal on metal total hip arthroplasties with pinnacle acetabular components related to the year of the initial operation? An interrupted time-series analysis using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

James Fletcher

Currently in Switzerland doing a placement. The prize part supported his travel.

Scroll to Top